Corporate fraud rarely stays with one regulator. AMLEGALS advises boards and executives across internal investigations, SFIO and agency responses, and a coordinated multi-agency defence.
White-collar matters are distinctive because a single set of facts can generate parallel exposure — criminal, regulatory and civil — across multiple agencies with different powers, timelines and incentives. The Enforcement Directorate, the police economic offences wing, the Serious Fraud Investigation Office and sectoral regulators may each take an interest, and a position taken before one can echo in the others. Treating each demand as an isolated reaction is how exposure multiplies.
The better approach is a single coherent strategy from the outset: a disciplined internal investigation under privilege to establish the facts, forensic reconstruction to quantify what happened, consistent factual positions across forums, careful document management, and a considered sequence of engagement. The same discipline, applied before any incident — anti-fraud governance, controls, whistleblower mechanisms and dawn-raid readiness — reduces both the risk and the cost of white-collar events. AMLEGALS advises boards and executives across this whole arc.
Structuring and conducting board-level internal investigations under legal privilege.
Working with forensic accountants to reconstruct transactions and quantify exposure.
Managing responses to SFIO and other agency investigations and document demands.
Coordinating positions across the ED, police, SFIO and sectoral regulators.
Defending directors, officers and the company against criminal and regulatory exposure.
Building anti-fraud governance, controls and dawn-raid response plans.
White-collar crime advisory covers the prevention, investigation and defence of financial and corporate wrongdoing — fraud, misappropriation, falsification of accounts, bribery, market and economic offences, and the regulatory and criminal consequences that follow. It spans internal investigations commissioned by a board, responses to agency investigations, and defence of companies and individuals, often across several forums and agencies at once.
The Serious Fraud Investigation Office is the specialised agency under the Companies Act 2013 that investigates serious corporate frauds, assigned by the Central Government. An SFIO investigation carries significant powers and consequences for the company and its officers. Engaging early — to manage document production, examination of personnel and the company’s position — is important to a coherent defence and to limiting collateral exposure.
An internal investigation is prudent where credible allegations of fraud or misconduct arise — through a whistleblower, audit finding or regulator query. A properly structured internal investigation, conducted under legal guidance with attention to privilege, helps the board understand what happened, decide on remedial and disclosure steps, and prepare for any external scrutiny. Done well, it is both a governance and a defence tool.
A single set of facts can attract the attention of several agencies — the Enforcement Directorate under the PMLA, the police economic offences wing, the SFIO, and sectoral regulators. Each has distinct powers, timelines and objectives, and positions taken before one can affect the others. A coordinated strategy — consistent factual positions, careful document management and sequencing — is essential, and is central to how AMLEGALS defends multi-agency matters.
Exposure is reduced by governance that works in practice: clear anti-fraud and anti-bribery policies, functioning internal controls, a credible whistleblower mechanism, due diligence on counterparties and transactions, and a rehearsed response plan for dawn raids and agency notices. Prevention and preparedness materially improve both the likelihood of avoiding incidents and the quality of the response when one occurs.
No. No engagement is treated as accepted until conflicts, scope and terms are confirmed in writing.
Share the nature of the concern — allegation, investigation or readiness — for a confidential preliminary assessment.