Preserving the evidence for urgent arbitration relief
An urgent application needs a clear account of the threatened harm and the records that establish it.
Read the guide Arbitration & Dispute Resolution
A stronger position starts with the record.
Practical analysis of interim protection, connected contracts, quantum, notices and post-award decisions.
The contextArbitration & Dispute Resolution.
Arbitration & Dispute Resolution.
The questions behind the work.
Arbitration strategy begins with the agreement, seat, governing law, institution and parties. Commercially connected events do not necessarily belong in a single proceeding. Jurisdiction, admissibility, merits and recoverable quantum are separate questions that need a coherent evidentiary record.
Read the practice notesFive decisions.
Five decisions.
Examined in detail.
One project, several contracts: can the disputes be heard together?
Commercial connection does not automatically establish common arbitral jurisdiction.
Read the guideFrom breach to a supported damages claim
A persuasive liability case still needs a separate explanation of causation, loss and recoverable quantum.
Read the guideThe arbitration notice after a contract has ended
Termination and invocation are different legal acts. The notice should preserve the claim without confusing the two.
Read the guideAfter the award: challenge, stay and enforcement are separate decisions
The post-award response needs a procedural assessment and an evidence file, not a fresh argument on every disputed fact.
Read the guideThe applicable framework
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs within its scope. The seat and the nature of the arbitration affect the applicable provisions and court jurisdiction. Institutional rules, amendments and current precedent require a matter-specific check.