01
International Arbitration
Representation in international commercial arbitrations under ICC, SIAC, LCIA, and UNCITRAL rules. Cross border disputes involving parties from multiple jurisdictions, governed by international legal frameworks.
Disputes are inevitable, and we resolve them through arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, from the clause that anticipates the dispute to the enforcement of the award.
Disputes are inevitable, and we resolve them through arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, from the clause that anticipates the dispute to the enforcement of the award.
Representation in international commercial arbitrations under ICC, SIAC, LCIA, and UNCITRAL rules. Cross border disputes involving parties from multiple jurisdictions, governed by international legal frameworks.
Ad hoc and institutional arbitrations under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. Construction disputes, commercial contract disputes, shareholder disputes, and joint venture disputes.
Construction and infrastructure claims, technology and IP disputes, shareholder and joint venture disputes, and supply and distribution disputes, each argued with the subject knowledge the matter requires.
Alternative dispute resolution through structured mediation and conciliation processes. Sometimes the best outcome is a negotiated settlement. We know when to fight and when to settle.
Enforcement of arbitral awards, both domestic and foreign. Execution proceedings. Challenging and defending awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
The arbitration clause determines the entire dispute resolution process. Seat, venue, governing law, institutional rules, number of arbitrators, and emergency arbitrator provisions. We draft clauses that serve clients when disputes actually arise.
Every engagement is read through three lenses at once, so the advice fits the technology, the commercial intent and the statute together.
Understanding the subject matter of the dispute. Construction arbitrations require technical knowledge of engineering and project management. Technology disputes require understanding of software development and IP. We bring subject matter understanding to every arbitration.
Dispute resolution costs money and time. We evaluate the commercial stakes, probability of success, and enforcement prospects before recommending a strategy. Sometimes the right advice is to settle. We tell clients that when it is true.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, CPC, Commercial Courts Act 2015, and institutional rules. Indian arbitration law has evolved significantly through Supreme Court jurisprudence. We track every development.
India’s arbitration landscape has transformed over the past decade. The 2015 and 2019 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 modernized the framework significantly. Time limits for awards, restricted court intervention, and institutional arbitration promotion have made India a more credible arbitration seat.
But the transformation is incomplete. Enforcement remains inconsistent across jurisdictions. Section 34 challenges, while narrowed in scope, still delay finality. And the quality of arbitration depends entirely on the quality of representation.
International commercial arbitration involving Indian parties has grown substantially. Indian businesses are parties to ICC, SIAC, LCIA, and UNCITRAL arbitrations involving claims worth billions. Cross border construction disputes, joint venture disagreements, investment treaty claims, and commercial contract breaches drive this volume.
Domestic arbitration handles the bulk of commercial disputes in India. Infrastructure and construction projects generate the highest volume, followed by shareholder and JV disputes, commercial contract claims, and real estate matters. The Commercial Courts Act 2015 has created a parallel track for high value commercial disputes in the court system.
The arbitration clause is where dispute resolution begins, but most businesses treat it as boilerplate. Seat selection, institutional rules, arbitrator qualifications, emergency arbitrator provisions, and consolidation mechanisms all affect how efficiently a dispute is resolved. We draft arbitration clauses with the same care we bring to substantive contract terms.
The statutes, rules and regulators that govern this practice. We track every amendment, circular and ruling so the position you take today still holds tomorrow.
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 governs both domestic and international commercial arbitration in India. Part I covers domestic arbitration and international commercial arbitration seated in India. Part II covers enforcement of foreign awards under the New York Convention and Geneva Convention.
The 2015 amendments introduced timeline discipline (12 months for award, extendable by 6), restricted Section 34 challenge grounds, and required automatic stay of award only with deposit. The 2019 amendments addressed arbitrator appointment, arbitration council establishment, and confidentiality.
The Commercial Courts Act 2015 created specialized commercial courts and commercial divisions in High Courts for disputes exceeding specified value thresholds (currently INR 3 lakh at district level). These courts follow a strict case management framework with defined timelines.
Institutional arbitration in India is growing through institutions like the Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration (MCIA), Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), and others. International institutions (ICC, SIAC, LCIA) maintain active India caseloads.
Enforcement of arbitral awards requires execution proceedings in court. Domestic awards become enforceable upon expiry of the Section 34 challenge period (3 months plus 30 days). Foreign award enforcement under Section 48 allows limited grounds for refusal.
We begin every dispute engagement with a comprehensive case assessment. Facts, evidence, legal issues, and commercial stakes. This assessment determines strategy: pursue litigation, initiate arbitration, or explore settlement.
For arbitration matters, we handle the entire lifecycle. Drafting the notice of arbitration, arbitrator selection and appointment, preliminary hearing participation, pleading preparation, evidence organization, witness preparation, oral hearing advocacy, and post award proceedings.
Our written submissions combine legal precision with practical persuasion. Arbitrators are experienced lawyers and former judges. They respond to well structured arguments supported by evidence, not to aggressive rhetoric.
For enforcement and challenge proceedings, we bring the same discipline. Section 34 challenge defences require anticipating and addressing every potential ground. Enforcement proceedings require systematic presentation of the award and underlying jurisdiction.
Draft your arbitration clause before a dispute arises, not after. The worst time to negotiate dispute resolution terms is when the parties are already in disagreement. Invest time in the clause at the contract stage.
Preserve evidence from the moment a dispute becomes foreseeable. Document retention policies, email preservation, and contemporaneous records make the difference between winning and losing. Evidence that is destroyed or unavailable creates adverse inferences.
Select arbitrators based on subject matter expertise, not just legal reputation. A construction dispute arbitrator should understand construction. A technology dispute arbitrator should understand technology. The right arbitrator reduces hearing time and improves award quality.
Consider costs realistically. Arbitration involves arbitrator fees, institutional charges, legal fees, expert witness costs, and administrative expenses. For claims below INR 5 crore, mediation or commercial court litigation may be more cost effective than institutional arbitration.
Short, direct, on the record.
Confidentiality, party autonomy in selecting arbitrators, flexibility in procedure, enforceability under the New York Convention for international awards, and typically faster resolution. However, arbitration also involves costs for arbitrator fees and institutional charges. The choice depends on the dispute value, complexity, and enforcement requirements.
Under the 2015 amendments, domestic arbitrations should conclude within 12 months from completion of pleadings (extendable by 6 months). In practice, complex commercial arbitrations take 18 to 24 months. International arbitrations vary based on institutional rules and complexity.
Yes, under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act on limited grounds including incapacity, invalid agreement, improper notice, scope exceeding the agreement, improper tribunal composition, non arbitrability, and conflict with public policy. Courts have narrowed the scope of interference significantly through recent jurisprudence.
Foreign awards from New York Convention countries are enforced under Part II of the Arbitration Act. The enforcement court can refuse enforcement only on limited grounds. India has generally become more pro enforcement in recent years, though challenges based on public policy grounds still arise.
The seat of arbitration (which determines the supervising court), governing law of the contract, institutional rules or ad hoc procedure, number of arbitrators, language of arbitration, and any emergency arbitrator provisions. A poorly drafted clause creates preliminary disputes that delay resolution of the substantive dispute.
Emergency arbitration allows parties to obtain interim relief before the tribunal is constituted. Available under most institutional rules (ICC, SIAC, LCIA). The emergency arbitrator can grant provisional measures within days. Indian courts have increasingly recognized emergency arbitrator orders, though enforceability is still evolving.
Deep dispute resolution experience across every major commercial sector. Our arbitration practitioners combine advocacy skills with subject matter knowledge in construction, technology, finance, and infrastructure.
We represent clients in both domestic and international forums. ICC Paris, SIAC Singapore, LCIA London, MCIA Mumbai, and ad hoc arbitrations across India. This breadth of experience means we understand the procedural expectations of different forums.
Our approach is outcome focused. We do not measure success by hours billed or hearings attended. We measure it by results. Favourable awards, successful enforcement, and commercial resolutions that serve our clients' business objectives.
Some disputes belong before a court, not an arbitral tribunal. When they do, representation has to be precise, prepared, and relentless from the first cause of action to the final execution of the decree.
Every business decision you make operates inside a legal structure, and we make sure yours is built right before it is ever tested.
Real estate transactions in India involve more regulatory complexity per square foot than almost any jurisdiction in the world, and we navigate all of it.
The strongest outcomes are built into the strategy at the start, not recovered from disputes later.