GCC ContractsTransfer PricingIntercompany AgreementsSafe HarbourIndia
AMLEGALS / GCC Advisory / GCC Royalty and Technology Fee Agreement India
Intercompany & Transfer Pricing Contracts

GCC Royalty and Technology Fee Agreement India

Structuring royalty and technology-fee payments from the Indian GCC to the parent — FEMA automatic-route compliance, withholding-tax obligations under the Income-tax Act and DTAA benefit claims.

3 min read
Key takeaway

Structuring royalty and technology-fee payments from the Indian GCC to the parent — FEMA automatic-route compliance, withholding-tax obligations under the Income-tax Act and DTAA benefit claims.

Practice area: GCC AdvisoryJurisdiction: IndiaAuthority: Income-tax Act 1961 (Sections 92, 92C, 92CA, 92D); Income-tax Act 2025 (corresponding provisions from 1 April 2026)
Strategic context

The issues that decide the outcome

Global Capability Centres in India operate as wholly owned subsidiaries providing services to foreign parent entities. Every intercompany transaction between associated enterprises must be priced at arm's length under Section 92 of the Income-tax Act, supported by contemporaneous documentation and a functional, asset and risk analysis that matches the entity's operational conduct to its contractual characterisation.

Indian revenue authorities have intensified scrutiny of GCC intercompany arrangements, challenging cost-base composition, mark-up adequacy and the exclusion of pass-through items. From 2026-27 the unified safe-harbour margin of 15.5 per cent applies to IT services, ITeS, KPO and contract R&D for centres with operating revenue up to two thousand crore rupees. Misalignment between the intercompany agreement and actual DEMPE functions remains the primary audit trigger.

Abstract navy and gold flowing circuitry representing royalty and technology fee arrangements for GCCs
Workstreams

How AMLEGALS acts

01

Intercompany agreement structuring

Drafting service agreements that accurately reflect the GCC's functional profile, cost base and mark-up methodology.

02

Transfer pricing documentation

Preparing contemporaneous TP documentation, benchmarking studies and Form 3CEB filings aligned with the Income-tax Act.

03

FAR and DEMPE analysis

Mapping functions performed, assets employed and risks assumed to ensure the contractual characterisation withstands tax-authority review.

04

Safe-harbour election advisory

Evaluating whether the unified safe-harbour margin provides certainty benefits or under-compensates value-adding GCC operations.

05

Cross-border payment structuring

Designing royalty, management-fee and recharge flows that satisfy FEMA, withholding-tax and DTAA requirements.

06

Dispute resolution and MAP advisory

Representing GCCs in transfer pricing assessments, appeals before the DRP and mutual agreement procedures under bilateral tax treaties.

Answers

Frequently asked questions

01What mark-up does the safe-harbour rule prescribe for Indian GCCs from 2026-27?

A unified margin of 15.5 per cent on total operating costs applies to IT services, ITeS, KPO and contract R&D for centres with operating revenue up to two thousand crore rupees, subject to election under the safe-harbour rules notified by the CBDT.

02Can management fees paid to the parent be challenged by Indian tax authorities?

Yes. Revenue authorities routinely scrutinise management fees under Sections 37 and 92 of the Income-tax Act. The GCC must demonstrate that specific services were received, that they provided a tangible benefit and that the pricing is at arm's length with adequate contemporaneous documentation.

03What is the consequence of a mismatch between the intercompany agreement and actual GCC operations?

If the FAR analysis reveals that the GCC performs functions, uses assets or assumes risks beyond what the intercompany agreement describes, the tax authority may re-characterise the entity from a routine service provider to a value-adding entrepreneur, resulting in a higher arm's-length compensation and potential adjustment with penalty and interest.

04How should pass-through costs be treated in the cost base?

Pass-through costs that the GCC merely reimburses without adding value should be excluded from the cost base on which the mark-up is applied. The intercompany agreement must explicitly identify and segregate these items to avoid inflated transfer pricing adjustments.

05Does an initial discussion with AMLEGALS on GCC contracts create a lawyer-client relationship?

No. An initial discussion is exploratory. A lawyer-client relationship arises only after conflicts clearance, scope definition and written engagement terms are agreed between the parties.

Engage AMLEGALS

Request a confidential assessment

Share the key facts for a confidential preliminary assessment of your India matter.

Request a confidential assessment

Business contact details are used only to respond to this request. No lawyer-client relationship arises until conflicts, scope and terms are agreed in writing.