Legal risk and compliant alternatives to EOR and PEO models for foreign employers.
Foreign companies wanting to hire in India without setting up an entity increasingly turn to employer-of-record and professional-employer-organisation models, where a third party is the legal employer and the worker is deployed to the foreign principal. This works in many jurisdictions, but in India it sits on uncertain ground: there is no dedicated EOR statute, the arrangement can expose the foreign principal to permanent-establishment risk for tax, and if the EOR is in substance supplying manpower the relationship can attract regulatory and tax characterisation the parties did not intend.
The question is rarely whether an EOR is strictly illegal and more often whether it is the right risk for the stage and headcount. We assess the specific EOR or PEO proposal against permanent-establishment, labour, and tax exposure, compare it against a liaison office, a project office, and a wholly owned subsidiary, and recommend the structure that matches the hiring plan. Where an EOR is used as a bridge, we build the documentation and the migration path to an entity so the transition is clean.
Assessing a proposed EOR or PEO arrangement for permanent-establishment, labour-characterisation, and tax exposure to the foreign principal.
Comparing EOR against a subsidiary, a branch, a liaison office, and a project office for the client headcount and timeline.
Evaluating whether the arrangement creates a taxable presence in India for the foreign principal under the Income-tax Act and the applicable treaty.
Structuring the EOR services agreement, the deployment terms, and the IP and confidentiality flow-downs to protect the foreign principal.
Designing the path and timing to move from an EOR bridge to a wholly owned subsidiary as headcount grows, including employee transfer.
Building oversight of the EOR payroll, statutory contributions, and labour compliance so the principal is not exposed to the EOR defaults.
There is no specific statute prohibiting it, and the model is used in practice, but India has no dedicated EOR law and the arrangement carries permanent-establishment and labour-characterisation risk for the foreign principal. It should be assessed case by case rather than assumed to be free of risk.
It can, depending on what the deployed employees do and how much control the foreign principal exercises. If the staff conclude contracts or carry on the core business of the foreign principal, a permanent establishment and a tax exposure can arise despite the EOR being the legal employer.
Usually once headcount, duration, or the nature of the work makes the permanent-establishment and compliance risk outweigh the convenience. We model the trigger points and build the migration so employees move to the new subsidiary without disruption.
No. No engagement is treated as accepted until conflicts, scope and terms are confirmed in writing. An initial discussion is confidential and is used only to understand the matter and assess fit.
Share the key facts for a confidential preliminary assessment of your India matter.