The direct answer

An acquisition consent review should identify change-of-control, assignment, transfer and other approval triggers in each material agreement. Distinguish contractual consent from statutory approval and map the consequences of non-compliance. Connect the result to closing conditions, covenants and the operating plan after completion.

The business situation

An illustrative scenario

A buyer signs a share purchase agreement expecting to retain a critical customer. The customer contract requires consent to a change of control, but diligence treated assignment as the only relevant trigger. The business can transfer shares without necessarily preserving the customer relationship on the assumed terms.

The diligence question is not merely whether a defect exists. It is whether the defect changes value, transaction structure, conditions to closing or the buyer's ability to operate the business. A share acquisition, business transfer and asset purchase allocate rights and liabilities differently.

What needs examining

01. Read the trigger against the transaction structure

A share acquisition may trigger change-of-control language without assigning the contract. A business transfer may require assignment or novation. Examine definitions, indirect changes, group reorganisations and exceptions. Do not infer consent requirements solely from an agreement's heading or a standard diligence questionnaire.

02. Prioritise by operational consequence

Identify which contracts support essential revenue, licences, premises, technology or supply. Assess termination, repricing, default and notification consequences. A small contract can be critical if it controls an indispensable dependency. Distinguish consent needed before closing from notice or cooperation that can occur afterwards, based on the actual terms and law.

03. Make the closing mechanism specific

Set responsibilities, acceptable consent language, deadlines and evidence of completion. Decide what happens if consent is withheld or delayed. A waiver of a closing condition changes the buyer-seller arrangement but does not itself waive a third party's rights. Record the commercial and legal basis for any decision to proceed with a residual gap.

Law, contract and recommended practice

The Companies Act, 2013, contract law and transaction-specific tax, competition, foreign-exchange, employment and sector requirements may apply. Approval and filing obligations should be checked against the actual parties, structure and thresholds, rather than inferred from the transaction's headline value.

Connect the control to the evidence

Use this table to scope the review. The legal basis and the practical control are identified separately.

Obligation or objectivePractical controlEvidence to retain
Contractual control
Satisfy applicable transfer or control triggers
Contract-by-contract consent matrixWritten consent or reasoned exception
Statutory assessment
Identify independent regulatory approvals
Structure and sector analysisApproval record and conditions
Recommended practice
Protect post-closing operations
Critical-dependency prioritisationResidual-gap decision and continuity plan

Records to prepare

Bring the complete, current record to the review. Preserve earlier versions where a change or disputed event makes them relevant.

Transaction structure and ownership chart
Material customer, supplier and licence terms
Consent correspondence and required forms
Closing conditions and waiver record

Common questions

Does a share deal avoid every consent requirement?

No. Change-of-control clauses may apply even where the contracting entity remains unchanged. Read the precise trigger and any exemptions.

Can the buyer waive the need for third-party consent?

The buyer may waive a condition in its acquisition agreement where permitted, but that does not remove a third party's contractual right or an applicable statutory approval requirement.

The next practical step

Prepare the consent matrix before fixing the closing timetable. Treat each unresolved critical consent as an operating decision with a documented consequence.

Legislation & official resources

These references identify the governing frameworks. Confirm the current text, relevant amendments and applicable judicial position for the matter.

This note is general information. The scenario is hypothetical and does not describe a client matter. The legal result depends on the facts, documents, jurisdiction and operative law. No individual lawyer review is represented by the preparation date.

Explore the AMLEGALS m&a practice