What types of contracts does AMLEGALS handle?

AMLEGALS provides comprehensive contract advisory across 43+ contract types including Technology contracts (SaaS, AI/ML, Cloud Services), Data Privacy agreements (DPAs, DPDPA compliance), Commercial contracts (MSAs, Supply, Distribution), IP & Licensing, Employment agreements, and International Trade contracts.

What is the TCL Framework for contracts?

The TCL Framework is AMLEGALS proprietary approach that examines every contract through three lenses: Technical (understanding the operational realities), Commercial (aligning business objectives), and Legal (ensuring compliance and risk mitigation). This integrated approach ensures contracts that work in practice, not just on paper.

Does AMLEGALS handle DPDPA-compliant contracts?

Yes, AMLEGALS specializes in DPDPA-compliant contracts including Data Processing Agreements, Cross-Border Transfer Mechanisms, Data Sharing Agreements, and Consent Management frameworks. Our Vibe Data Privacy™ framework ensures comprehensive compliance with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.

Can AMLEGALS help with AI and technology contracts?

Yes, AMLEGALS has dedicated expertise in AI/ML Contracts, AI Governance agreements, AI Training Data Licensing, SaaS Agreements, Cloud Services agreements, and System Integration contracts. We address emerging issues like algorithmic accountability, model ownership, and AI liability allocation.

What is the patent term in India?

Patents in India have a twenty-year term from the date of filing, regardless of the time required for prosecution. However, patents must be maintained by paying renewal fees, initially after the second year and annually thereafter. Non-payment results in lapse. The effective commercial term depends on prosecution duration—patents that take longer to issue provide fewer years of enforceable exclusivity.

What cannot be patented in India?

Section 3 of the Patents Act excludes: inventions contrary to public order or morality, mere discoveries or scientific theories, abstract theories, substances in nature, business methods, computer programs per se, traditional knowledge, plants and animals (other than microorganisms), and methods of agriculture or horticulture. Section 3(d) specifically addresses pharmaceutical compounds, requiring enhanced efficacy for new forms or derivatives.

How does freedom-to-operate analysis work?

Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis determines whether commercializing a product or process would infringe third-party patent rights. The process involves: identifying relevant jurisdictions, searching patent databases for potentially relevant patents, analyzing whether the commercial activity falls within patent claims, and assessing validity and enforceability. FTO opinions inform decisions about product design, licensing needs, and risk management.

What is the compulsory licensing provision?

Under Section 84, any person can apply for a compulsory license three years after patent grant if reasonable requirements of the public are not satisfied, the patented invention is not available at reasonably affordable price, or the invention is not worked in India. Section 92 provides for compulsory licensing in national emergencies. These provisions balance patent exclusivity against public interest, particularly relevant for pharmaceuticals.

Patent Protection Agreements | Patent Prosecution India | Patent Licensing

Overview

Patents represent the cornerstone of innovation protection. A patent grants its holder a twenty-year monopoly in exchange for public disclosure of the invention. This bargain—exclusivity for knowledge—forms the foundation of patent systems worldwide. But a patent is only as valuable as its scope, its enforceability, and the commercial strategy built around it. Patent protection agreements structure these elements, transforming a patent from a legal document into a commercial asset.

Patent prosecution requires navigating the Patent Office with precision. Claims must be drafted broadly enough to prevent design-arounds yet specifically enough to survive validity challenges. The specification must enable persons skilled in the art to practice the invention. Provisional applications establish priority dates while full applications undergo substantive examination. Each decision during prosecution shapes the patent's ultimate value—or valuelessness.

Beyond individual patents, portfolio strategy determines competitive position. Which inventions merit patent protection? How do patents relate to trade secrets for the same innovation? Where geographically should protection be sought? How should licensing and enforcement strategies be coordinated? These questions require integration of legal, technical, and commercial perspectives that define effective patent protection.

Key Considerations

Prosecution Strategy

Claim drafting, specification preparation, Office Action responses, and appeal strategies aligned with commercial objectives.

Freedom-to-Operate

Analysis of third-party patent rights, design-around strategies, and risk mitigation through licensing or invalidation.

Portfolio Management

Strategic decisions on filing, maintenance, abandonment, and geographic coverage based on commercial value.

Inventor Obligations

Duty to disclose prior art, assignment requirements, and cooperation in prosecution and enforcement.

Enforcement Mechanisms

Infringement monitoring, cease-and-desist protocols, litigation strategy, and injunctive relief procedures.

Licensing Architecture

Exclusive vs. non-exclusive grants, field-of-use restrictions, territorial limitations, and royalty structures.

Applying the TCL Framework

Technical

Patent protection begins with technical understanding. The invention must be novel, non-obvious, and useful. Claims must be drafted with technical precision—each word carries legal weight. Prior art searches require technical literacy to identify relevant disclosures. Infringement analysis demands understanding both the claims and the accused product. Working with inventors, technical experts, and patent agents requires translating between legal and technical languages.

Commercial

Patents exist to create commercial value. The prosecution strategy should reflect commercial priorities: Which competitors matter? Which products are most valuable? Which geographic markets are essential? Patent portfolios should be actively managed—patents that no longer serve commercial purposes drain resources without benefit. Licensing strategies should balance revenue generation against competitive dynamics.

Legal

The Patents Act, 1970 defines patentable subject matter, prosecution procedures, and enforcement mechanisms. Section 3 exclusions remove certain categories from patentability. Compulsory licensing provisions in Sections 84-92 constrain patent holder rights in specific circumstances. The Patent Rules govern filing, examination, and opposition procedures. International treaties—Paris Convention, PCT, TRIPS—create a global framework that Indian law implements.

“

"A patent without commercial strategy is a certificate suitable for framing. A commercial strategy without patent protection is an invitation for competitors. The integration of legal protection with market positioning determines whether innovation investment generates returns."

Anandaday Misshra

Managing Partner, AMLEGALS

Common Pitfalls

Premature Disclosure

Public disclosure before filing destroys novelty. Confidentiality agreements and controlled disclosure are essential before patent applications are secured.

Claim Scope Miscalculation

Claims drafted too broadly face rejection; claims drafted too narrowly allow design-arounds. Calibrating scope requires market and competitor analysis.

Prior Art Blindness

Failure to search and disclose relevant prior art can result in patent invalidation. Comprehensive searches must include non-patent literature.

Geographic Underprotection

Patents are territorial. Failing to file in key manufacturing or sales jurisdictions leaves competitors free to operate.

Maintenance Failures

Patents require periodic fee payments to remain in force. Administrative failures can result in irrecoverable lapses.

Indian Patent Law Framework

The Patents Act, 1970 as amended governs patent protection in India. The Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks administers the system through patent offices in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, and Chennai. Section 3 excludes certain subject matter including methods of agriculture, mathematical methods, business methods, and computer programs per se. Section 3(d) requires enhanced efficacy for pharmaceutical derivatives. Compulsory licensing under Section 84 is available three years after grant if reasonable requirements are not satisfied. Pre-grant and post-grant opposition procedures provide third-party challenge mechanisms. India is a signatory to the Paris Convention and PCT, enabling international filing strategies. TRIPS compliance shapes substantive requirements.

Practical Guidance

Conduct comprehensive prior art searches before investing in prosecution.
Draft claims at multiple levels of abstraction to hedge against prior art and design-arounds.
Maintain detailed invention records with dated, witnessed documentation.
File provisional applications early to establish priority while refining claims.
Coordinate patent and trade secret strategies for comprehensive protection.
Implement systematic monitoring for potential infringement in key markets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Practice Areas

Intellectual Property Technology & IT Life Sciences

Need Assistance with Patent Protection?

Our team brings deep expertise in intellectual property matters.

Contact Our Team