Employment & HRContract Architecture

Non-Compete Agreements

Post-employment restrictions balanced against enforceability considerations

Overview

Non-compete agreements attempt to restrict where employees can work after their employment ends. While employers have legitimate interests in protecting confidential information, customer relationships, and workforce investment, these interests must be balanced against the employee's fundamental right to earn a livelihood. Indian law approaches this balance with considerable skepticism toward post-employment restrictions.

Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act declares void any agreement in restraint of trade. Indian courts have generally interpreted this to render post-employment non-compete clauses unenforceable, with limited exceptions. This legal position contrasts sharply with many other jurisdictions where reasonable non-competes are routinely enforced. Employers seeking to protect legitimate interests in India must therefore consider alternative mechanisms.

The alternatives to unenforceable non-compete clauses include: robust confidentiality agreements that protect specific information, garden leave arrangements where the employee is paid during a restriction period, non-solicitation provisions targeting customer and employee relationships rather than competition generally, and contractual structures that incentivize loyalty rather than attempting to compel it.

Key Considerations

1

Enforceability Assessment

Realistic evaluation of whether proposed restrictions would be enforced under Indian law.

2

Alternative Protections

Confidentiality, non-solicitation, and other mechanisms that achieve protection within legal constraints.

3

Garden Leave

Paid notice periods during which restrictions apply while employment continues.

4

Geographic and Temporal Scope

Narrowing restrictions to the minimum necessary to address legitimate interests.

5

Compensation Linkage

Additional consideration for any restrictions that increases voluntary compliance likelihood.

6

Industry Practice

Understanding how similar employers in the sector approach these restrictions.

Applying the TCL Framework

Technical

  • Identifying specific confidential information requiring protection
  • Understanding the competitive landscape and potential harm
  • Assessing role-specific exposure to protectable interests
  • Evaluating technical barriers to competition
  • Understanding knowledge transfer and training investments

Commercial

  • Valuing the interests sought to be protected
  • Structuring consideration for restrictions
  • Modeling cost-benefit of garden leave approaches
  • Addressing equity and deferred compensation alignment
  • Managing executive departure scenarios

Legal

  • Drafting within Indian Contract Act constraints
  • Structuring alternatives to direct non-compete
  • Creating enforceable confidentiality provisions
  • Addressing non-solicitation with appropriate scope
  • Building dispute resolution suited to urgency
"The question is not whether a non-compete clause can be drafted, but whether it can be enforced. In India, the answer is usually no. Smart employers focus instead on the protections that are enforceable - confidentiality, non-solicitation, and economic incentives for loyalty."
AM
Anandaday Misshra
Founder & Managing Partner

Common Pitfalls

Overreach

Provisions that are broader than necessary, increasing unenforceability risk and employee resistance.

Template Adoption

Using provisions from other jurisdictions without adapting to Indian law constraints.

Confidentiality Conflation

Treating non-compete and confidentiality as interchangeable when they have very different enforceability.

No Consideration

Adding restrictions without additional consideration, weakening any enforcement argument.

Practical Ineffectiveness

Provisions that cannot practically be monitored or enforced even if legally valid.

Legal Framework

Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act provides that every agreement by which anyone is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business is void to that extent. Courts have consistently held that post-employment non-compete restrictions fall within this prohibition. Limited exceptions may exist during employment (e.g., exclusive service clauses) and potentially for genuine sale of goodwill situations. The Competition Act may also be relevant where restrictions affect market competition. Global employers must reconcile Indian law positions with different rules in other jurisdictions.

Practical Guidance

  • Accept that post-employment non-competes are likely unenforceable in India.
  • Focus on robust confidentiality agreements with specific scope.
  • Consider garden leave for senior positions with appropriate funding.
  • Structure non-solicitation carefully to target relationships rather than competition.
  • Use equity and deferred compensation to incentivize rather than restrain.
  • Maintain global consistency where possible while respecting local law limits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Practice Areas

Need Assistance with Non-Compete?

Our team brings deep expertise in employment & hr matters.

Contact Our Team