What types of contracts does AMLEGALS handle?

AMLEGALS provides comprehensive contract advisory across 43+ contract types including Technology contracts (SaaS, AI/ML, Cloud Services), Data Privacy agreements (DPAs, DPDPA compliance), Commercial contracts (MSAs, Supply, Distribution), IP & Licensing, Employment agreements, and International Trade contracts.

What is the TCL Framework for contracts?

The TCL Framework is AMLEGALS proprietary approach that examines every contract through three lenses: Technical (understanding the operational realities), Commercial (aligning business objectives), and Legal (ensuring compliance and risk mitigation). This integrated approach ensures contracts that work in practice, not just on paper.

Does AMLEGALS handle DPDPA-compliant contracts?

Yes, AMLEGALS specializes in DPDPA-compliant contracts including Data Processing Agreements, Cross-Border Transfer Mechanisms, Data Sharing Agreements, and Consent Management frameworks. Our Vibe Data Privacy™ framework ensures comprehensive compliance with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.

Can AMLEGALS help with AI and technology contracts?

Yes, AMLEGALS has dedicated expertise in AI/ML Contracts, AI Governance agreements, AI Training Data Licensing, SaaS Agreements, Cloud Services agreements, and System Integration contracts. We address emerging issues like algorithmic accountability, model ownership, and AI liability allocation.

What matters should require unanimous consent in a JV?

Reserved matters requiring unanimity typically include: constitutional changes, material business changes, significant contracts or expenditures above thresholds, related party transactions, admission of new members, distributions, and exit-related decisions. The appropriate list depends on JV structure and party concerns, but overly extensive reserved matters create gridlock risk.

How should deadlock be resolved?

Deadlock mechanisms progress from soft to hard resolution: escalation to senior management, mediation or expert determination, and ultimately buy-out provisions (Russian roulette, Texas shootout, or similar mechanisms). The appropriate approach depends on party resources, relationship dynamics, and whether forced exit is acceptable. Buy-out mechanisms must include practical valuation methodologies.

What exit mechanisms are standard in JV agreements?

Standard exit provisions include: transfer restrictions preventing sales to competitors, pre-emption rights giving first refusal to continuing venturers, tag-along rights protecting minorities from unfavorable sales, drag-along rights enabling sale to third parties, and put/call options for specific exit scenarios. Valuation mechanisms must be practical when exit occurs, often years after agreement.

How does competition law affect JVs?

Competition law affects JVs in two ways: merger control requires notification when thresholds are met, and substantive competition rules constrain collaboration between competitors. JVs between competitors receive particular scrutiny for whether they facilitate coordination beyond the JV's scope. Information exchange, non-compete provisions, and market allocation all require careful analysis.

Joint Venture Agreements | JV Contracts India

Overview

A joint venture represents one of the most complex commercial relationships parties can enter. Unlike a simple supplier-customer arrangement with clear roles, a joint venture creates shared ownership, shared control, and shared risk in pursuit of objectives neither party could efficiently achieve alone. The joint venture agreement must constitute this new entity - defining its purpose, governance, economics, and the rights and obligations of its venturers.

The tensions inherent in joint ventures make their agreements particularly challenging. Each party wants control but must share it. Each wants return but must share the economic benefits. Each wants flexibility but needs commitment from the other. The agreement must create a structure in which parties with different cultures, strategies, and time horizons can make decisions and execute together. When that structure fails, the agreement must provide mechanisms to resolve deadlock or exit.

Joint ventures in India present additional considerations. Foreign investment regulations may require specific structures. Competition law constrains how competitors can collaborate. Sectoral regulations may impose requirements on JV participants. Tax structuring affects the choice between incorporated and contractual joint ventures. These regulatory dimensions must be integrated into the commercial agreement.

Key Considerations

1

Purpose and Scope

Clear definition of the JV's business, including any exclusivity commitments and restrictions on competition.

2

Governance Architecture

Board composition, voting thresholds, reserved matters, and the balance between majority rule and minority protection.

3

Capital Structure

Initial contributions, additional funding obligations, and mechanisms for addressing capital needs.

4

Economic Arrangements

Profit distribution, transfer pricing for dealings with venturers, and dividend policies.

5

Deadlock Resolution

Mechanisms for resolving disputes when governance fails, from escalation to buy-out provisions.

6

Exit Architecture

Transfer restrictions, pre-emption rights, tag/drag provisions, and valuation mechanisms.

Applying the TCL Framework

Technical

Understanding each party's operational contribution
Assessing technology and IP that parties will contribute
Evaluating integration requirements between venturer operations
Understanding technical standards and quality requirements
Reviewing technology evolution and upgrade responsibilities

Commercial

Aligning venturer economic expectations
Structuring transfer pricing for related party transactions
Negotiating exclusivity scope and competitive restrictions
Addressing different investment time horizons
Creating incentive alignment for JV management

Legal

Complying with FDI and sectoral regulations
Addressing competition law requirements
Structuring for tax efficiency
Creating enforceable governance mechanisms
Drafting exit provisions that work in practice

“

"A joint venture agreement is a constitution for a business marriage. It must accommodate the parties' different cultures and objectives while creating a structure that can make decisions and execute. When that structure breaks down, it must provide a path to resolution or divorce. Both require careful architecture."

AM

Anandaday Misshra

Founder & Managing Partner

Common Pitfalls

Governance Gridlock

Reserved matter lists so extensive that routine decisions require unanimity, creating operational paralysis.

Exit Impracticality

Valuation mechanisms that sound reasonable but cannot practically be applied when exit occurs.

Scope Ambiguity

Unclear boundaries between JV activities and venturer activities leading to competition and conflict.

Cultural Mismatch

Governance structures that do not account for different decision-making cultures and timelines of the venturers.

Regulatory Non-compliance

Structures that fail competition law scrutiny or violate FDI requirements, requiring unwinding.

JV Regulatory Framework

Joint ventures in India navigate multiple regulatory frameworks. FDI policy establishes sectoral caps and conditions that may affect foreign participation. The Competition Act requires notification of combinations meeting thresholds and scrutinises competitor collaborations. The Companies Act governs incorporated JVs. SEBI regulations apply where listed companies are involved. Sector-specific regulations may impose additional requirements in areas like telecommunications, insurance, or defence. Tax considerations affect the choice of structure and the treatment of venturer contributions.

Practical Guidance

Conduct thorough due diligence on potential JV partners before commitment.
Invest heavily in defining purpose, scope, and boundaries clearly.
Design governance for the decisions you will actually face, not theoretical scenarios.
Test deadlock mechanisms against realistic scenarios before finalising.
Create operational protocols alongside the legal agreement.
Plan for relationship evolution - the circumstances at formation will not persist.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Contract Types

Distribution Agreements

Commercial & Corporate

Channel partner contracts balancing exclusivity with performance obligations

Technology Licensing Agreements

Intellectual Property

Patent and trade secret licenses with field-of-use restrictions and royalty structures

Shareholders' Agreements

Financial & Investment

Governance, transfer restrictions, and exit rights among equity holders

Supply & Procurement Agreements